Likert scale used where the subject or respondent is required to mark their answers on the statement based on a scale from one extreme to another extreme. Part C for student characteristics which focusing on self-awareness and motivation. Compared to the four factor model, the three factor model is chosen as fear of English class was not brought up as an important issue in this study. Hence, being competent and proficient in the first language L1 is not given the only focus, but for future-wise, it is necessary to master English language. The products of those years of language learning can be measured through being able to listen, understand and respond to oral second language simulation, such as conversation, mass media using English and so on; able to speak up their mind and converse casually using English; able to read and understand written simulations such as printed materials or unprinted materials; and able to write academic writings or pleasure writing in English. Based on the Table , it is shows that respondents
Its followed by 35 respondents Lecturers can continues the lesson in the i-learn. Students involved in this study are students from Semester 1 Part 1 a total of 60 persons consisting of two groups of students. This study demonstrated that the self-efficacy, motivation, accessibility and reliability positively related to student performance. In this study, we have try to synthesized data from surveys carried out in UiTM Johor. Thus, it will save time.
Therefore, of them The correlation of language anxiety and those three potential predictors of learner variable are discussed in this chapter.
A Framework in Three Parts. Doctorate Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. In this study, we have try to synthesized data from surveys carried out in UiTM Johor. Dominant Factor Influencing Student Performance Based on the Figurethe dominant factor influencing student performance is self-efficacy, 0. The highest mean of anxiety factors is on speech anxiety variable, while the lowest mean of anxiety factors is recorded for fear of making mistakes variable.
On the other hand, the scale had demonstrated satisfactory questionnaife coefficients with the first samples of population to which it had been administered.
Before the actual questiohnaire collection period, a pilot study was conducted to test reliability of the questionnaire as well as to get hhesis and suggestions from the respondents. Teaching Listening and Speaking: I often feel like not going to my language class. Instead of using interview method like other past researches would employ, the lecturers will not be stressed to spare their time from their busy daily routine to have a typical 30 to 40 minutes interview when they could answer the questionnaire in less time than that.
In reviewing the current literature, the following gaps were found; firstly, much of the literature focuses on the adoption decision of the internet among firms. It is known as i-Learn.
To be more specific, i-Learn in UiTM uses mixed method between component of learning care and face to face teaching method. It is known as i-Learn.
The first way is quiz conducted manually which is the lecturer prepared the quiz and asked students to answer the quiz during tutorial hour in class. Likert scale used where the subject or respondent is required to mark their answers on the statement based on a scale from one extreme to another extreme.
They also know what is i-Learn system and know how to access the system. An expected result of this study was to see a clear correlation factors are reviewed with student performance.
(PDF) Example of research proposal | Maisaroh Mohamad Fadzil –
How is pronunciation accuracy affected? Exploratory studies provide information to use in analyzing a situation. In addition, there was no significant relationship between pronunciation accuracy and anxiety in the group work environment.
Doctorate Dissertation, Florida State University. In addition, listening anxiety was found to be significantly related to two background factors, university major, and study with tutors or in private language institutes.
I often feel like not going to my language class. There was no gender difference in the total scores for the FLCAS, which gives an impression that the overall anxiety level does questionmaire differ between men and women. There are two categories falled into this variables which is technology characteristics accessibility and reliability and second category is student characteristic self- questoonnaire and motivation.
From theory and research to classroom implication pp.
In the left side, its shows the independent variables which is factor affecting the usage of i-Learn. Its shows that, female respondents are higher than male respondents are and it is tell us male respondents are minimum uses in term of the i-Learn system.
Its shows that, female respondents are higher than male respondents are and it is tell us male respondents are minimum uses in term of the i-Learn system. Part C for student characteristics which focusing on uktm and motivation. What is it that makes them anxious about communicating in English?
Besides that, the other problem is degree of complexity in utilizing the i-Learn system.